|
As described in my letter to the committe's chairman, their report has been little more than self-serving tripe. This was no better demonstrated than in the foreward to the report where the chairman went out of his way to thank three groups of people: These people are already being paid for their work! Why do they need to be thanked? What about the unpaid work of parents, community volunteers, and those who prepared submissions in their own time? It is possible to conclude that two and a half years and countless taxpayer dollars have been wasted, but I think at least two valuable things have come out of this enquiry: Of the submissions I have read, three seem to stand out as exemplary: Mr Scott ThompsonMr Thompson is a primary school teacher in country Victoria where rather than limit himself to standard teaching techniques, he has developed his own style based on "business in the classroom".Mrs Vivianne ByrnesMs Byrnes is an independent educator with a website presence. She draws from her years of experience to provide practical and proven techniques on what works for boys. Mrs Rosemary AndersenIn a breathtakingly simple submission, Mrs Andersen presents a compelling remedy - that boys and girls are separated in school.The big danger in many of the committee's recommendations is that by the time their suggestions get to the people who have to implement them, they may have been subverted or just ignored. Mrs Anderson's recommendation can be quickly, cheaply and uncompromisingly implemented - after which would likely lead to: Copyright © 2002, Phil Bachmann | |